Showing posts with label bases. Show all posts
Showing posts with label bases. Show all posts

Wednesday, January 21, 2015

Uber Appeal Denied - Must 'Fess Up unless Commish gives a pass

A New York City Taxi and Limousine Commission judge has rejected Uber's appeal of an order issued two weeks ago suspending its base licenses. The car service must now turn over data on all trips for its 12,700 car fleet, the Daily News reports.

But just as the original order never went into effect -- the TLC immediately stayed it when Uber said it would appeal-- Uber says that the suspensions will somehow have no effect on its operations. The company is expected to petition TLC chairwoman Meera Joshi to set aside the order.

A TLC judge suspended five of Uber’s six bases in New York City after on January 7. Unlike taxi drivers who are made to serve their suspensions immediately, Uber was allowed to operate with a temporary license pending the appeal. Now, Uber may still operate by resort to its sixth base. All of Uber's bases are virtual in any event-- that is, none of Uber's cars ever have to park there, or even visit.

Monday, November 10, 2014

NY AG wants Livery Drivers to be Free

According to BuzzFeed, New York Attorney General Eric Schneiderman is weighing in against a newly-proposed rule that would require livery cab drivers to affiliate with one base and one base only. Schneiderman has written a letter to the TLC saying hat the proposed rules, as written, would unfairly limit competition. “From a competitive standpoint, these advances may lower the costs of entry for new for-hire vehicle services and encourage existing services to compete more effectively for both drivers and passengers.”
The proposed rule would, some fear, give Uber an insurmountable competitive advantage because a driver limited to one base would naturally ally with Uber, the market leader, because it has the most potential passengers using its app.  The TLC would allow multiple affiliations if there was a formal agreement between bases allowing drivers affiliated with one to also affiliate with the the other. 
But Schneiderman says this requirement would still unduly restrict the drivers. “Requiring agreements between competitors raises serious antitrust issues. Ultimately the proposed rule is likely to lead to market consolidation around a small number of the best-capitalized and most well-known services, whether large existing firms or well-financed newcomers. This market concentration will hurt consumers, who can expect fares to increase and service to decline. If this anticompetitive outcome followed from collusion in the industry, it would be illegal. It is no less disturbing as a product of regulatory action,” the letter reads.  
Even Uber has opposed the rule, though it would supposedly benefit from it.  The real losers, if the rule passes, are more likely to be livery drivers who may want to ally themselves with a neighborhood base and also sign on with Uber, Lyft or some other app-bases service to gain business when a business is slow at a local base.
The TLC likes the proposal because it would make the industry easier to regulate.
Uber has also said it does not like the rule because it comes with a requirement that for-hire vehicle bases would be submit trip data to the TLC,